Authors

Ojo Kurdi

Mechanical Engineering Department, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia

Dwi Basuki Wibowo

Mechanical Engineering Department, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia

Toni Prahasto

Mechanical Engineering Department, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia

Abstract

In this study, the influence of deposition orientation and specimen thickness on the flexural strength of 3D-printed polylactic acid (PLA) plates was examined. The samples were fabricated using the Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) method with five deposition orientations—0–0, 0–90, 45–45, 90–90, and honeycomb—and two thicknesses of 3.2 mm and 6.4 mm. Flexural testing followed the ASTM D790-03 standard procedure. The results indicate that deposition orientation plays a decisive role in determining the mechanical response. Specimens printed at 0–0, where filaments run parallel to the loading axis, achieved the highest flexural strength (103.10 ± 6.29 MPa at 3.2 mm thickness), while honeycomb structures exhibited the lowest values (around 17.5 MPa). A two-way ANOVA confirmed a highly significant effect of deposition orientation on flexural strength (p< 0.001). Although the main effect of thickness alone was not statistically significant (p = 0.153), the interaction between orientation and thickness was significant (p< 0.001), suggesting that the impact of thickness depends on the printing direction. Post-hoc tests further showed that only the 0–0 and 90–90 orientations displayed meaningful differences between thickness levels. Overall, the findings highlight that the mechanical anisotropy of FDM-printed PLA is largely controlled by filament alignment and interlayer bonding. By selecting appropriate deposition orientation and part thickness, the flexural strength of printed PLA components can be notably improved, providing practical guidance for engineers in designing reliable, load-bearing 3D-printed parts.

Keywords

3D printing FDM PLA deposition orientation specimen thickness flexural strength

Citation of this Article

Ojo Kurdi, Dwi Basuki Wibowo, & Toni Prahasto. (2025). The Effect of Deposition Orientation and Thickness on the Flexural Strength of PLA Plate Produced by 3D Printing. Current Journal of Engineering and Science Research. 2(11), 1-5. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.47001/CJESR/2025.211001

Licence Copyright (c) 2026 Current Journal of Engineering and Science Research. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International Licence.

References

  1. Gibson, I., Rosen, D. W. & Stucker, B., 2010, Additive Manufacturing Technologies. 2010. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1120-9
  2. Wang, X., Jiang, M. & Zhou, Z., 2017, 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective. Composites Part B: Engineering. Vol. 110:442-458. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034
  3. Zhou, L.Y., Fu, J., & He, Y., 2020, A Review of 3D Printing Technologies for Soft Polymer Materials. Adv Funct Mater. Vol. 30(28):2000187. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202000187
  4. Ligon, S.C., Liska, R. & Stampfl, J., 2107, Polymers for 3D Printing and Customized Additive Manufacturing. Chem. Rev. 2017. Vol. 117(15):10212-10290. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074
  5. Zhang, Y., Liu, X. & Zeng, L., 2019, Polymer Fiber Scaffolds for Bone and Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Adv Funct Mater. Vol. 29(36):1903279. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201903279
  6. Roseti, L., Parisi, V. & Petretta, M. 2017, Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: State of the art and new perspectives. Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications. Vol. 78. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.017
  7. Ahn, S.H., Montero, M. & Odell, D., 2002, Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS. Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2002. Vol. 8(4):248-257. DOI: 10.1108/13552540210441166
  8. Mohamed, O.A., Masood, S.H. & Bhowmik, J.L., 2015, Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects. Adv. Manuf. Vol. 3(1):42-53. DOI: 10.1007/s40436-014-0097-7
  9. Ebel, E., & Sinnemann, T., 2014. Fabrication of FDM 3D objects with ABS and PLA and determination of their mechanical properties. RTe Journal, Vol 11(1). Abgerufen von https://rtejournal.de/rte/article/view/2014_3
  10. Nugroho, A, Ardiansyah, R, Rusita, L, Larasati, IL, 2018, Effect of layer thickness on flexural properties of PLA (PolyLactid Acid) by 3D printing. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1130. 12017pp. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1130/1/012017
  11. Yeoh, CK., Cheah, CS., Pushpanathan, R., Song, CC., Tan, MA.& The, P., 2020, Effect of infill pattern on mechanical properties of 3D printed PLA and cPLA, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 957 012064, DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/957/1/012064
  12. Minh, PS., Nguyen, VT., Uyen, TMT., Do, TT., Van, ADT.& Dang, hnl., 2024, The effects of 3D printing designs on PLA polymer flexural and fatigue strength, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, Vol 34(6), DOI 10.1088/1361-6439/ad4b2a
  13. Khusheef, AS., Hashemi, R. & Shahbazi, M., 2024, Optimizing FDM process parameters: predictive insights through taguchi, regression, and neural networks, Physica Scripta, Vol 99(6), DOI 10.1088/1402-4896/ad42d7
  14. Hamoud, M., Elshalakany, A.B., Gamil, M. et al. Investigating the influence of 3D printing parameters on the mechanical characteristics of FDM fabricated (PLA/Cu) composite material. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 134, 3769–3785 (2024). DOI 10.1007/s00170-024-14313-0
  15. Kaiahara, F. H., Pizi, E. C. G., Straioto, F. G., Galvani, L. D., Kuga, M. C., Arrué, T. A., Junior, A. R., Só, M. V. R., Pereira, J. R., & Vidotti, H. (2025). Influence of Printing Orientation on the Mechanical Properties of Provisional Polymeric Materials Produced by 3D Printing. Polymers, 17(3), 265. DOI 10.3390/polym17030265
  16. Hamid, RA., Husni, S. & Ito, T., 2022, Effect of Printing Orientation and Layer Thickness on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of PLA Parts. Malaysian Journal on Composites Science and Manufacturing. 8. 11-23. DOI 10.37934/mjcsm.8.1.1123.