Authors M VardhanDepartment of Computer Science Engineering (Cyber Security), GATES Institute of Technology, Gooty, Andhra Pradesh, IndiaB KartheekDepartment of Computer Science Engineering (Cyber Security), GATES Institute of Technology, Gooty, Andhra Pradesh, IndiaB Jaya PrakashDepartment of Computer Science Engineering (Cyber Security), GATES Institute of Technology, Gooty, Andhra Pradesh, India Abstract Digital forensics has become a fundamental component of cybercrime investigations, where digital text evidence, including emails, chat records, documents, and system logs, plays a crucial role in identifying and prosecuting malicious activities. Preserving the authenticity and integrity of such evidence is essential, as even slight modifications can compromise forensic analysis and affect legal admissibility. Although conventional security mechanisms primarily emphasize data encryption to maintain confidentiality, they often lack robust methods for verifying data integrity before the decryption process. The growing incidence of cyber-attacks, digital tampering, and online fraud has created a demand for forensic frameworks capable of both protecting and authenticating digital evidence. In the absence of effective integrity verification, encrypted data may still be altered, resulting in unreliable forensic outcomes and reduced evidential value. To overcome these limitations, the proposed Twin Route Forensics framework integrates user authentication, secure encryption, and hash-based integrity verification into a unified system. The framework ensures that digital text evidence is decrypted and restored only after successful validation of its authenticity, thereby preventing unauthorized modifications and preserving data reliability. By combining confidentiality with pre-decryption integrity checking, the proposed approach enhances the security, trustworthiness, and evidential value of digital text data. The system provides a robust solution for modern digital forensic investigations and contributes to the development of more secure and dependable cybercrime investigation processes. Keywords Digital Forensics Digital Evidence Text Evidence Authentication Data Integrity Verification Cryptography Hash Functions Cybercrime Investigation Data Encryption Digital Evidence Preservation Information Security. Citation of this Article M Vardhan, B Kartheek, & B Jaya Prakash. (2026). A Secure Digital Forensic Framework for Text Evidence Authentication and Integrity Validation. Current Journal of Engineering and Science Research. 3(5), 32-39. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.47001/CJESR/2026.305005 Licence Copyright (c) 2026 Current Journal of Engineering and Science Research. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International Licence. References W. Stallings, Cryptography and Network Security: Principles and Practice, 7th ed. Boston, MA, USA: Pear-son, 2020.B. Schneier, Applied Cryptography: Protocols, Algorithms, and Source Code in C, 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Wiley, 2019.A.Kahate, Cryptography and Network Security, 3rd ed. New Delhi, India: McGraw-Hill, 2018.E. Casey, Digital Evidence and Computer Crime: Forensic Science, Computers and the Internet, 3rd ed. Lon-don, U.K.: Academic Press, 2019.National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), “Advanced Encryption Standard (AES),” FIPS PUB 197, 2022.National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), “Secure Hash Standard (SHA-256),” FIPS PUB 180-4, 2021.A.Menezes, P. van Oorschot, and S. Vanstone, Handbook of Applied Cryptography. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2018.M. Kahn, J. Smith, and R. Brown, “Integrity verification techniques in digital forensics,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 145672–145681, 2020.D. Quick and K. R. Choo, “Forensic analysis of encrypted data: Challenges and solutions,” Digital Investigation, vol. 22, pp. 45–56, 2019.L. Bass, P. Clements, and R. Kazman, Software Architecture in Practice, 4th ed. Boston, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley, 2018.I.Sommerville, Software Engineering, 10th ed. Boston, MA, USA: Pearson, 2020.R. S. Pressman and B. R. Maxim, Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 9th ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 2019.K. Kent, S. Chevalier, T. Grance, and H. Dang, “Guide to integrating forensic techniques into incident response,” NIST Special Publication 800-86, 2021.M. Rogers and S. Seigfried-Spellar, “Digital forensic evidence reliability and integrity,” Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2019.H. Kaur and R. Singh, “Secure text data storage using cryptographic techniques,” International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 176, no. 9, pp. 18–24, 2018.A.Patel and D. Shah, “Secure authentication and integrity verification in web-based systems,” International Journal of Information Security, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 325–334, 2020.OWASP Foundation, “OWASP Top 10 – Web Application Security Risks,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://owasp.org.IEEE Computer Society, “Digital forensics and evidence integrity standards,” IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 72–79, 2020.